Posted on May 1st, 2013 No comments
Authorities in Central Florida suspect three Broward County men of being part of an infamous “felony lane gang,” one or more groups of South Floridians who travel far from home to commit car burglaries, bank fraud and identity thefts.
Ench Smith, 33, and Guercy Smith, 26, both of Pompano Beach, and Traver Paul, 19, of Fort Lauderdale, are among the latest suspects accused of such schemes across Florida and the rest of the country.
The trio was more than 220 miles north of Broward on Tuesday, when police in Casselberry arrested them each on charges of burglary, criminal mischief and petty theft. Patrons at an LA Fitness in Casselberry, northeast of Orlando, reported their vehicles were burglarized, and police said they caught the suspects as they drove away.
The men were in a rental car, and their actions were similar to those committed by other suspected felony lane gang members, Casselberry Police Capt. David Del Rosso said. Police said they are not sure if the men are members of an elaborate crime ring or merely a group of petty criminals who adopted the scheme for a quick and easy score.
“It could be something they learned to do in jail, or they are a spinoff of other groups,” Del Rosso said. “Bottom line is they were doing the same type of crimes associated with a felony lane gang.”
Even though “felony lane gang” suggests one group, it actually is more than one ring of thieves carrying out such crimes, officials said. While gang cells may not be working together, their schemes usually take on similar patterns.
In most cases, those arrested have South Florida addresses and travel in rental cars. They target cars parked at state parks, day care centers, gyms, supermarkets and cemeteries. Their loot usually includes wallets or purses containing credit and debit cards and checkbooks.
The thieves later drive to the victims’ banks to cash stolen checks, often wearing wigs and sunglasses for disguises. They often use the farthest drive-through teller lanes to avoid surveillance cameras. Thus the term “felony lane.”
In Broward, Ench Smith has primarily dealt with traffic offenses. His short prior criminal history excludes any arrests consistent with being part of a large-scale organized crime group, records show.
His alleged accomplices have a more serious criminal history, records show.
Since 2008, Guercy Smith has pleaded no-contest and been sentenced to probation on several charges, including aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and drug possession, state records show.
Paul was most recently arrested in Miami-Dade County on March 22 on charges of fleeing police and reckless driving. He is awaiting trial in that case. Since 2008, he has pleaded no-contest and been sentenced to probation on several offenses, including firing a gun into an occupied dwelling and battery.
Authorities say those involved in felony lane-type crimes have distinct roles, and the crimes often are aimed at stealing victims’ identities. Some act as organizers and recruit other members, some conduct robberies to obtain identification documents, and others go to banks to cash fraudulent checks.
In recent months, federal officials say they have made some progress in cracking down on felony lane suspects from South Florida.
In December, a grand jury in Pennsylvania returned a four-count indictment, charging 10 people with conspiracy to commit fraud, bank fraud, wire fraud and aggravated identity theft. With the exception of a Texas woman, all the alleged group members reportedly were from Broward.
In that case, federal officials said group members committed crimes in Pennsylvania from August to October 2012. During that time, they allegedly broke into numerous vehicles and stole the identities of more than 100 people.
The “smash and grabs” occurred at about 25 state parks and recreation centers in and around the Middle District of Pennsylvania.
Heidi Havens, a spokeswoman for federal prosecutors in Pennsylvania, said the cases are expected to go to trial next month.
Posted on July 8th, 2010 No comments
The health care industry can soon expect a greater emphasis on enforcing the HIPAA security rule than in years past.
That’s the message that Susan McAndrew, deputy director for privacy at the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights, delivered May 11 at the Safeguarding Health Information conference in Washington. OCR sponsored the conference with the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Federal enforcement of the security rule transitioned in 2009 from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to the OCR. The office continues to build expertise on the security rule, but much of the transition work is done, McAndrew says. “Transitions are always longer than you expect.”
To boost enforcement of the security rule, OCR has added investigators in 10 regional offices, McAndrew notes. “We’re hoping that with additional feet on the ground, we’ll be able to do many more security cases as the year moves forward.”
The HITECH Act links privacy and security–and enforcement of both HIPAA rules–enabling regulators to look at these issues from a more holistic viewpoint, McAndrew says. As the electronic world moves into the clinical side, the health care industry increasingly will find that privacy and security issues collide, she contends. “Without a sound security policy, privacy will just be a principle.”
Consequently, 2010 is when the industry will really start to see a realization of HITECH’s privacy and security initiatives enacted in 2009, McAndrew says. “We’re hoping to move security to the forefront and make it a real partner with privacy in our enforcement.”
View original source here
Posted on July 6th, 2010 No comments
Here’s another egregious example of a health care provider being nothing less than reckless with patient data.
Last August a Greensboro, NC resident was looking for cans when he found boxes and boxes of unshredded patient data stuffed in a dumpster. The files belonged to a local urgent care center named Prompt Med. According to the North Carolina Attorney General’s office about 600 files were recovered that held personal information on 757 people. Some of the information within the records included names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, drivers’ license numbers, and insurance account numbers, as well as personal health information.
The Greensboro resident took a sampling of the medical files to a local television station, and after their reporting, the state attorney general’s office launched an investigation and announced a settlement and a fine against Prompt Med. From the North Carolina Department of Justice press statement on the imposed fine:
Under the settlement, Prompt Med is permanently barred from improperly disposing of patient records and has paid $50,000, including $26,650 in civil penalties that will go to public schools. The remaining $23,350 will go to fund consumer protection education and enforcement efforts, and to cover the costs of the Attorney General’s investigation into the company. In addition, Prompt Med also paid an additional $50 for proper destruction of the illegally dumped records.
At the request of the Attorney General’s office, Prompt Med previously reported the incident as a security breach and notified consumers whose information was placed at risk. A security breach happens when records containing personal information are lost, stolen or inappropriately displayed.
Unfortunately, we’re seeing way too many similar incidents around the country. Make informed decisions about immediate and long-term security needs. Even more unfortunate: we’re not seeing nearly enough similar fines levied. Let’s hope the North Carolina Attorney General’s Office sets a new tone going forward.
View original source here
Posted on July 3rd, 2010 No comments
Authorities in Middle Township are investigating what township resident Carla Carpenter found in her most recent inspection of the townships trash.
On Friday, June 11, Carpenter called NBC 40 to the Middle Township Recycling Center where she was waiting with documents she had picked out of the trash the night before. According to Carpenter these records included, police reports, tax records, and other materials, that listed names, social security numbers, addresses and telephone numbers.
Carpenter said in her TV interview “It makes me think that my information is not safe,”—- “I don’t trust the government because of it. The government should know, you shred and they’re not shredding. They’re putting out information that anyone can use.”
After her interview, Township Administrator Mark Mallett came to the recycling center to check out what was found. Mallett said he would look into the type of reports that were discarded. “What I can do is continue to reinforce the importance of needed to shred this type of information,” said Mallett.
According to police this was not the first time Carpenter had sifted through the Townships garbage. More then a week ago the Township was contacted by Carpenter, reporting personal information was found.
Police department spokesperson Lt. John Edwards said detectives were called to the scene to conduct an internal inquiry into what was found and not a criminal investigation. Edwards said some of the documents found were public information and some were not.
View original source here
Posted on July 2nd, 2010 No comments
When a mound of Middletown city documents containing people’s private information was found in a public dumpster this spring, it wasn’t the first — or largest — such security breach by a local government.
An investigation by this newspaper has found that Butler County’s Department of Job and Family Services learned in 2008 that confidential records from that agency were being “periodically” improperly disposed of in a public bin.
An internal analysis by the agency found that 10,600 people could have been affected.
This is the number of people who used the JFS office at 4122 Tonya Trail in Fairfield Twp., where the documents originated. They included case notes and verification forms dealing with the Ohio Works First, food stamps, Medicaid and child care programs.
Though the records were supposed to be shredded using a document disposal company, county officials found that office had been simply throwing the records in a recycling bin.
That’s where they were found by a member of the public on July 18, 2008.
The county took action to make sure the records were disposed of properly, and considered notifying the people who may have had information compromised.
Officials drafted a letter suggesting people could use a free Internet service to guard against identity theft.
But they never sent the notice out.
Instead, they decided to “wait and see if there is any response from clients,” according to internal memos.
Two years later, those clients still have no knowledge their information could have been compromised.
“They should have told us from the very beginning,” said Christina Cruz, who used the JFS office during that time.
County held back on response to a records breach
When Jerome Kearns first saw the pile of confidential records from his office in a Dumpster by Butler Tech, he thought they were stolen.
It was July 18, 2008. County records lay out in detail what happened next: what county officials did — and didn’t — do.
There were piles of papers — files from Butler County Job and Family Services, where Kearns is assistant director, and from LifeSpan, the county engineer’s office, Children Services, and Butler County Child Support Enforcement Agency.
Some of the records contained confidential information, such as case notes and eligibility verifications for food stamps, Ohio Works First, subsidized child care and Medicaid programs.
Kearns estimates there were about 10 60-gallon trash bags of records. He called co-worker Adam Jones because Jones had a pickup truck.
“They weren’t going to fit in my Elantra,” Kearns said. “There was a significant number of records there.”
The records had been found by a member of the public.
“Some member of the community was throwing their stuff in there, and picked one up and thought they were important,” Kearns said.
Kearns took the records back to where they presumably came from, the JFS office at 4122 Tonya Trail, off Liberty Fairfield Road in Fairfield Twp.
Documents pitched ‘periodically’
It didn’t take long to solve the mystery.
The next day, Kearns asked Kim Gay, manager of that office, where the bins were that she used for confidential information. In other county offices, special bins were periodically picked up by the company Royal Document Destruction for shredding.
The Fairfield Twp. office, which had been open since January 2007, had no such bins. Staffers there had been throwing records in the recycling bins. Believing that there was no confidential information involved, a worker for Butler County Environmental Services, which handles recycling for county offices, “had dumped these bins at community sites periodically over the last six months,” Kearns wrote later.
County officials went into action.
They brought new, secure bins to the Tonya Trail office. They pulled records and found 10,600 people who had used that office in the prior 12 months. They researched a company that provides protection for people at risk of identify theft, and what it would cost to cover all those people.
They put together a list of addresses, and drafted a letter notifying people who may have been affected.
“Although we consider the risk to you to be relatively low, the fact is that we failed to adequately protect your confidentiality, and we want to rectify that now,” the letter said.
Then, they did nothing. The letter never went out.
“I asked Tim (Williams, then county administrator) for direction regarding our records that were found in a (D)umpster,” says a Aug. 19, 2008, memo from Kearns. “Tim indicated that (county) commissioners would like to wait and see if there is any response from clients.”
“Tim does not want us to send a letter out notifying clients that their records might have been compromised,” the memo says.
Two commissioners said they were satisfied there was no proof that anyone had their information misused, and that the risk of that happening was low.
“There was nothing to lead us to believe there was more (records dumped in public bins),” said Commissioner Donald Dixon. “We were advised the risk was not sufficient to warrant any other action at that time.”
Dixon said his concern was that making the situation public might make someone more likely to look for the records.
Commission President Gregory Jolivette said notifying the public was also an expensive prospect.
“From my recollection, it was going to cost a lot of money to go another route,” he said.
Commissioner Charles Furmon declined comment for this story.
‘No affirmative obligation’
County officials consulted with the prosecutor’s office and the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services. They came to the conclusion that a state law requiring agencies to tell the public about security breaches didn’t apply to them.
“Final discussion with (Ohio JFS attorney Ramesh Thambuswamy) on Aug. 6, 2008, concluded that there was no requirement to contact client(s) about a potential breach,” reads a memo from Roger Clark, Butler County JFS legal supervisor. “Ramesh also restated that he does not think (the law above) should be used as guidelines for our county.”
The attorney recommended they take corrective action and document everything in writing, which they did.
“There was no affirmative obligation … ( for JFS) to contact anybody,” said Bruce Jewett, interim county administrator.
“We thought the likelihood of any of that information being used was extremely low, and I’d say that was a position that developed over time,” Jewett said. “That’s not to say I didn’t treat the matter with the appropriate level of concern.”
Jewett is and was director of Butler County JFS, and is currently president of the county’s records commission.
“Ultimately, I was comfortable with the decision that was made,” he said.
Kearns said it was unlikely any of the records they found were compromised because they didn’t sit in the Dumpster very long.
But no one knows how often or how many times such records were tossed in a public bin since the office opened in 2007. That makes it unclear exactly what kinds of records were improperly disposed of over that year.
“We have no proof there was confidential information put in those Dumpsters,” Kearns said. “I have no way of knowing that number was 10,600.”
Kearns said no one was disciplined because the person who opened the Tonya Trail office, and so was deemed responsible for not providing the proper bins, left the county. That office closed in April of this year.
Part of the reason the risk of identity theft was deemed low was because those affected were low-income, Kearns and Jewett said.
“Our clients typically don’t have assets,” Kearns said.
‘That’s messed up’
“That’s messed up,” said Christina Cruz, 30, one of the people who used that office during that time period. “They should have told us from the very beginning,”
Cruz, who lives in Hamilton, collected Ohio Works First money when she was pregnant with her daughter, now 2. She said all someone would need is her Social Security number to steal her benefits.
Constance Iredale said when her daughter Christa, now 26, applied for Medicaid, food stamps and child care benefits at the Tonya Trail office during that time, she provided all kinds of confidential information.
“It’s household income, everybody in the household … my Social Security number, my cell number, my work number, copies of check stubs, all that information is on there,” she said.
“We were never informed that any of this happened,” said Iredale, a Liberty Twp. resident. “Hopeful, thank God, knock on wood, none of my stuff has been compromised,” she said.
View original source here
Posted on July 1st, 2010 No comments
A dumpster outside a St. John’s doctor’s office, listed as Dr. David Brown’s, was wide open and filled with patient folders and other medical records.
Attorney Nicole Knepper told News 4 that throwing records in a dumpster would be a violation of federal HIPAA regulations. A spokesperson for St. John’s said disposing of medical records in a dumper is not the correct protocol, they should have been shredded. She said the doctor said the files are old and he ran out of space, but it was the wrong thing to do, and he knows he made a mistake. A mistake that has the potential to be costly. Attorney Knepper told News 4 that civil and criminal penalties can be applied. Depending on the facts of each case, you may have a civil case for invasion of privacy as well.
Statement from Dr. David Brown:
In an effort to dispose of some files that were many years old, I made a mistake by using improper procedures for disposal of patient records. Medical practices always have an obligation to protect patient information, regardless of the age of the record. I sincerely regret that this occurred. The files have been retrieved and the records will be disposed of properly. I will fulfill all reporting obligations required by law. I am very sorry for any concern this has caused and want to assure my patients that going forward that I will follow proper disposal procedures.
View original source here
Posted on June 30th, 2010 No comments
Who dumped medical records, containing confidential patient information, at the DMV?
These are some of the most sensitive, intimate personal medical records a person can have. A county worker was tossing garbage into the dumpster at the Auto Bureau in Cheektowaga and spotted boxes of files that just didn’t belong there.
Erie County Clerk Kathy Hochul has taken temporary custody of the records until she gets word from health officials, telling her what to do with these highly sensitive, and very personal medical files.
The records belonged to the former Avalon Center, a clinic in Clarence for western New Yorkers with eating disorders, which closed back in November.
Hochul said, “There was patient information there, there was social security card information on there, there was diagnosis information. So we mainly became concerned. We alerted the County Health Department and they sent us to the State Health Department.”
For former patient Ashley Chudy of Amherst, she’s left with a feeling of anger and betrayal.
“There’s a lot of really sensitive information in those files that I don’t believe the world should be seeing, or anyone should be seeing. They should have closed when Avalon closed,” said Chudy.
Chudy’s mother, Terry Weinstein added, “Eating disorders are such a privative, secretive illness to begin with. It takes a lot for people to come forward, and the fact that they came forward and were receiving treatment, then everything they believed was being kept confidential, you know, it’s out there. That’s pretty scary.”
We tried to reach the former owner of the Avalon Center, Art Boese, on his home phone and cell phone, but our messages were not returned. In the meantime, those files are locked up with the County Clerk.
View original source here